Rachel Barton Pine moves easily between musical worlds that many listeners keep in separate boxes. She records Corelli on Baroque instruments, transcribes heavy metal, and speaks about both with the same grounded seriousness. What ties it together is curiosity—and an insistence that music should feel alive rather than “museum-correct.”
Early on, she says, the violin wasn’t just something she did. “By the time I was five,” she recalls, “I was really identifying as a violinist… being a violinist was my whole sense of self.”
A childhood built around music
Training quickly became intense: school, practice, long drives to rehearsals, homework and dinner “in the car.” By age eight, the pace had become unsustainable, and Pine shifted into homeschooling. The change, she says, “ironically made my childhood more normal.” Instead of spending full days locked to a school schedule, she could work more efficiently and regain time to be with other kids.
Just as important was the learning style that followed. Pine describes an approach she calls “binge learning”—staying with a topic until you’ve genuinely had your fill. “If you’re still curious about it,” she says, “you can stay on it… and learn more about it. And then when you feel satiated, then you can move on.”
That mindset spilled into music: reading about composers’ lives, digging into history, and seeking out specialists whenever a question grabbed her. “Always letting my curiosity rule,” she says—then adds that the basic pattern hasn’t changed. “Even though I’ve long since graduated high school, my lifestyle really hasn’t changed.”
Suzuki and the psychology of learning
Pine began with Suzuki, and she’s clear that the method is bigger than its repertoire. “Suzuki is less about the selected repertoire… [and] more about the philosophy behind the way of teaching.” She values its insistence on positivity without lowering standards: “It’s not giving somebody a participation trophy.” The practical point is to reinforce what works while staying direct about what needs fixing—so the student stays motivated and keeps improving.
No conservatory, but not by choice
Pine’s path diverged from the usual conservatory trajectory. Financial realities meant she couldn’t attend university, even with scholarship support. “For me, it simply was not an option,” she says. She was already working extensively and contributing to household stability.
Artistically, she felt prepared through high-level training and performance experiences, but she’s blunt about what she missed: the lifelong peer networks that form in conservatory life. “People who went to conservatory together have that bond… and then carry that on to musical projects.” Her conclusion is emphatic: “That’s really the reason that nobody should ever even consider not going to conservatory.”
Motivation that doesn’t feel like discipline
When asked about practicing, Pine rejects the framing. “People would say, ‘How do you have the self-discipline to practice your violin for six hours?’” Her answer: “It doesn’t take self-discipline. It’s fun. I want to do it.”
What great concerto conducting requires
Pine offers a clear picture of how soloist–conductor collaboration actually works. The key is alignment before the orchestra rehearsal. “The first rehearsal is always just the conductor and soloist,” she explains, because if interpretation is negotiated in real time with the orchestra present, “there’s going to be kind of a time lag.” The conductor has to know the soloist’s approach so well they can “almost anticipate what I’m going to do.”
Disagreement happens, but rarely. When it does and neither party yields, coherence can break down: “The tutti sections and the solo sections didn’t have a whole lot to do with each other… Probably not the best experience for the audience.”
Heavy metal transcription as translation, not novelty
Pine’s metal work isn’t a gimmick. It’s partly an argument against the misconception that violin equals “sleepy, pretty stuff… in a hotel lobby or a dentist’s waiting room.” She enjoys pointing out the lineage: “All the great electric guitarists stole all their licks from the virtuoso violinists of the 1700s.”
She also dismantles the assumption that metal is harmonically “dense” in the written sense. “Sonically it’s very thick,” she says, “but if you break it down into what notes are actually being played, very often it’s quite sparse”—often melody, bass, guitar, plus drums. The challenge is converting rhythmic drive and layered timbre into something convincing on strings.
Corelli, ornamentation, and reclaiming improvisation
For Pine, Corelli represents both craft and historical influence. He helped shape sonata architecture—especially the distinction between sonata da chiesa and sonata da camera—and his music remained a benchmark unusually long. “Corelli was the exception,” she says. Musicians kept studying him as “the standard of beauty.”
What made this recording personally fresh was ornamentation. Baroque slow movements, she notes, were meant to be elaborated: “You were actually supposed to do a lot of improvisation.” In past recordings she planned ornaments in advance for consistency. This time, she took a risk and improvised in the session itself: “Every take was different… I didn’t know what notes I was going to play until they were happening.” Even now, she says, “I don’t actually know what notes I’m going to hear.”
Corelli also carries a symbolic weight. As a teenager, she traced her musical genealogy teacher-to-teacher back to him: “He’s actually my ultimate musical ancestor.”
Highlights from the Interview
“Binge learning” as an engine for musicianship
Why concerto success depends on anticipation and coherence
Metal transcription as structural clarity, not just sound mass
Baroque ornamentation as real-time creativity
Watch the full interview on YouTube
Support Atlanta Music Critic on Patreon
No comments:
Post a Comment