When Craft, Not Fashion, Drives Programming
A January 13 concert
at Mercer University brought together three composers—Sergei Taneyev, Moritz
Moszkowski, and Ernő Dohnányi—whose music once occupied the center of European
musical life and now sits largely outside the standard repertory. What united
the program was not novelty or rediscovery for its own sake, but a shared
commitment to musical density, structural seriousness, and late-Romantic craft.
It was repertory chosen by musicians confident enough to
trust the music and the audience.
Taneyev: Structure Without Weight
Taneyev’s Trio for Two Violins and Viola opened the
evening with intellectual rigor and formal clarity. A student and close
associate of Tchaikovsky, and a figure respected by Scriabin and Rachmaninoff,
Taneyev synthesized Russian lyricism with Germanic discipline, favoring
counterpoint and structural logic over surface warmth.
The four movements unfold with classical balance and
constant activity among the voices. Yet the scoring creates a specific
expressive challenge. Without a cello or bass to provide downward pull, the
music occupies a narrow vertical band, concentrated largely in the middle and
upper registers. The ear follows continuous motion without the grounding effect
lower voices typically supply. The density is linear rather than cumulative,
producing activity without corresponding weight.
In a large hall, this can feel diffuse despite the intricacy
of the writing. The trio might register more persuasively in a much smaller
space, where proximity could lend intimacy and focus to its finely worked
textures.
Moszkowski: Refinement Without Pressure
Moszkowski’s Suite for Two Violins and Piano, Op. 71
offered a contrasting aesthetic. Once celebrated for his elegance and
brilliance, Moszkowski writes fluently and idiomatically, with an acute sense
of balance between instruments. The two violins converse gracefully while the
piano sparkles without dominating.
Rooted firmly in the late-Romantic German tradition, the
suite unfolds through characterful movements that emphasize lyricism, polish,
and ensemble clarity. Its pleasures are genuine but largely self-contained,
satisfying in the moment without generating the sense of pressure or
inevitability that compels return. Where Taneyev accumulates detail without
weight, Moszkowski avoids accumulation almost entirely.
That restraint, however accomplished, helps explain his
marginal position today.
Dohnányi: Density Fulfilled
Dohnányi’s Piano Quintet No. 1 closed the program and
immediately asserted its scale and ambition. Drawing heavily on Brahmsian
models, Dohnányi intensifies that inheritance through thick harmonic layering,
massed sonorities, and frequent unison writing reinforced by the cello.
Here, density becomes expressive rather than problematic.
The sound is saturated, muscular, and unapologetically full. Where Brahms
compresses energy, Dohnányi amplifies it. The melodic writing is generous, the
climaxes forceful, and the emotional temperature consistently high.
Despite its derivative language, the piece succeeds because
it commits fully to its aesthetic. Among the composers on the program, Dohnányi
emerged as the most persuasive, not by transforming the late-Romantic style,
but by mastering its demands.
Performance and Perspective
The performances were musically and technically first-rate,
marked by clarity of ensemble and sustained commitment to demanding repertoire.
These works may be out of fashion, but they were played as if their value were
self-evident. Special commendation is due to the Mercer students—Benjamin
Linton, Isaac Willocks, Brinson Moore, and Kathryn Fakely—whose playing
approached the level of their mentors in assurance and musical intelligence.
The faculty—Amy Schwartz Moretti, Robert McDuffie, Lawrence Dutton, and pianist
Albert Tiu—brought commanding technique and deep musical authority to every
page.
This was an extraordinary concert not because the music was
forgotten, but because it was treated as worthy of serious attention. Revivals
of this kind are not undertaken lightly. They require musicians secure enough
in their craft, and confident enough in their judgment, to program music that
does not flatter, simplify, or explain itself.
That confidence was audible throughout the evening.

No comments:
Post a Comment